This is a problem commonly experienced by training providers, as they cannot be accredited if they do not offer programmes that are aligned to registered unit standards and/or qualifications. Unit standards are widely available in the more tangible and technical fields, and on the lower NQF levels up to level 4 (the equivalent of grade 12).
However, in many fields, especially management, leadership and change management, there are very few unit standards on the higher education level above NQF level 5.
One of the reasons for this is that it is more difficult to capture the more intangible, higher-level competencies in unit standards, for example complex reasoning, critical thinking, generating original, creative solutions to unforeseen problems, or personal and interpersonal competencies related to emotional intelligence.
The fact that unit standards have not been registered in these areas surely does not mean that such training should not be provided. It would also be unfair to penalise training providers where there are no national standards on which to base their programmes.
Therefore, these programmes can still be offered, and may even be included in the WSPs. If these providers have well-designed programmes, competent facilitators, clearly formulated objectives and outcomes, proper assessment processes, and a proven track record in addressing learning needs, then clients should continue contracting them.
