CCMA

This week Ivan Israelstam explains why employers and managers are well-advised to ensure that they understand exactly what employee entitlements are under the Basic Conditions of Employment Act (BCEA). In addition, when hearing dismissal disputes under the Labour Relations Act (LRA), the CCMA may also allow employment conditions under the BCEA to be heard with the dismissal matter.

This week Ivan Israelstam says: "without proof your case goes poof!" Arguing your case vehemently but without any substantiating evidence will not win your case - no matter how good your debating skills. What is required to win your case at a CCMA or bargaining council arbitration is evidence. Ivan explains that evidence may be presented via witnesses, documents, video, or recordings, and outlines the process at arbitration.

Employers may be surprised to find that there are costs that may accrue when they fail to follow correct disciplinary procedures in dismissing employees. There may be Conflict Dispute Resolution Centre - attached to Bargaining Councils (CDR) or Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA) costs. This week Ivan Israelstam explains what the potential costs are when employers fail to follow the requirements for dismissing employees for a fair reason and following a fair procedure.

Labour law cases often make reference to "piercing the corporate veil" and readers may wonder whether this is only to do with corporate business. In fact, it relates to business of all sizes, some of which may be very small cc operations. This week Ivan explains what sort of business activities may result in arbitrators or judges "piercing the corporate veil" and the costs that may result.

When a CCMA notice of an arbitration hearing arrives in a busy Human Resources department, there is a very real possibility that it does not receive the full attention that it deserves. The failure of an employer to attend an arbitration hearing at the CCMA without very good reason may be a very expensive error of judgement. This week Ivan Israelstam explains the grounds the Labour Court will accept for overturning an arbitration award.

Section 197 of the Labour Relations Act (LRA) requires the new employer, in a takeover as a going concern, to take over all the employees of the old employer. A takeover of an enterprise “as a going concern” essentially means that the new employer is carrying on the same business as the old employer after a takeover. This week Ivan Israelstam explains that it is possible to vary the impact of the transfer if all the affected parties - including the employees are consulted and an agreement is reached.

Business takeovers - or transfers as a going concern - mean that the new owner of the business takes over all the employees and all the responsibilities of the old business. In addition, retrenchments as a result of a going concern transfer are regarded as automatically unfair. This week Ivan Israelstam explains some of the - potentially very expensive - technicalities.

Ivan Israelstam

Employers do not always take allegations of sexual harassment seriously - such allegations may give rise to jokes and innuendo. However, employees have a right to a safe workplace and protection from discrimination. Cases of sexual harassment that are mishandled may lead to findings of unfair discrimination. Ivan Israelstam cites some cases to demonstrate the implications of failing to take seriously allegations of sexual harassment.

Ivan Israelstam

This week Ivan Israelstam explains what happened to employers who tried to avoid the requirements of the section on probation in the Code of Good Practice on Dismissal. Pretending an employee is on a fixed term contract - or an independent contractor - will cause just as much trouble at the CCMA. So the best practice is to provide the counselling, guidance or training that a probationary employee requires.

Ivan Israelstam

This week Ivan Israelstam makes the case that labour law has become more restrictive upon employers. He explains that those who have used repeated fixed term contracts should no longer do that - only employ on a fixed term contract where there is a genuine short term job. Secondly, using labour brokers - TES or temporary employment services - has also become more restrictive and difficult as a result of the latest labour law amendments.

Ivan Israelstam

Suspension is an action usually associated with the disciplinary procedures - sometimes before a hearing and sometimes as a sanction. However, there are other circumstances where suspension may be used. But are these suspensions on full pay and for what period can an employee be suspended? This week Ivan Israelstam explains the options and the potential pitfalls.

Ivan Israelstam

When employee behaviour is dishonest or at a similarly serious level that dismissal appears to be the appropriate response, it is particularly important that employers follow the correct disciplinary procedures. Part of those procedures is to ensure that there is a suitably qualified, unbiased chairperson to hear the matter fairly and in an unbiased manner. Ivan Israelstam provides some examples.

Ivan Israelstam

Employers should be aware that allowing senior management to overrule junior management, who are more knowledgeable and experienced in disciplinary procedures may be risky. This week in his second article of the series, Ivan Israelstam explains what double jeopardy is, and how employers who fail to understand double jeopardy, may make very costly mistakes.

Ivan Israelstam

This week Ivan Israelstam launches a series of articles dealing with the changes to labour law implemented by the Department of Labour. The articles will also make reference to how case law - that is decisions by the CCMA, bargaining councils and courts affect how the labour laws are to be implemented.

Ivan Israelstam

Employers may believe that referring to any dishonest behaviour as "fraud" will help them in achieving a dismissal. However, as Ivan Israelstam explains "fraud" has a very specific meaning, and in order to sustain a dismissal decision at the CCMA, the employer needs to understand what is involved, and how to present the evidence to support this allegation.

Ivan Israelstam

As ivan Israelstam demonstrates this week, there are many reasons why spiteful actions arise in workplaces. But when emotions and egos come into play, the results can be both expensive and destructive for the business. To avoid these dangers you may want to read on and follow Ivan's advice.

Ivan Israelstam

What makes an employment relationship intolerable, and why is this important anyway? Those are the questions that Ivan Israelstam addresses this week. He explains why it is important that an employer understands what this means, and what other factors to take into account before proceeding with a dismissal decision.

Ivan Israelstam

This week Ivan Israelstam explains the differences between a retrenchment (an operational requirements dismissal) and a mutually agreed termination of an employment contract. The procedures to be followed are different and the nature of the document that concludes the ending of the employment contract are significantly different. Mixing up these two types of agreement can be expensive.

Ivan Israelstam

In the mid 1990s the old labour legislation was repealed and was replaced by our current Labour Relations Act (LRA) negotiated between government, employers and trade unions. Due to the fact that parties had substantially different agendas they were often unable to agree on a number of important details of law which were therefore omitted from the LRA. Some detail as to the intention of the law is provided in the form of codes of good practice and other gaps may be filled by case law. Ivan Israelstam explains further.

Ivan Israelstam

The level of work performance of employees is a crucial factor in the advancement of South Africa’s economy and in the success of each enterprise. This is one reason that the law does allow employers to dismiss employees who fail to perform according to performance standards. However, the same legislation lays down very stringent tests to establish whether dismissal for poor performance is appropriate in each specific instance.

Ivan Israelstam

The huge losses resulting from the current spate of strike raise the question of how such strikes can be prevented. Is it possible that private arbitration could reduce the damage of extended strikes? Ivan Israelstam explains how this may be done.

Ivan Israelstam

Employers ask whether a disciplinary code is necessary in terms of labour law. This week Ivan Israelstam explains why he believes that a disciplinary code is a valuable tool for employers.

Ivan Israelstam

Victimisation is an allegation made by employees sometimes under the Labour Relations Act and sometimes under the Employment Equity Act. Ivan Israelstam explains various acts that are classified as victimisation, but also points out gaps in the laws. He advises employers to proceed with caution and not think that they have a free hand in their behaviour with employees.

Ivan Israelstam

Employers may not compromise the privacy of an employee's private emails in terms of the legislation regulating interception of communications. Therefore, Ivan Israelstam advises that employers ensure that they have employees' written acceptance that their emails sent using company facilities may be monitored.

Employers who hold senior positions in multi-national and national organisations may hold an arrogant belief that the CCMA Commissioner will believe their testimony against that of a junior employee. Ivan Israelstam explains why this approach could lead to the company losing the arbitration.

Pages

Subscribe to CCMA