Advertisement

dismissal

packing boxes

Very few workplace issues elicit as firmly held views or fears as the topic of constructive dismissal. Whether it is a manager, fearful of doing something wrong and at risk of an employee lodging the dreadful claim of constructive dismissal, or Harvey Spectre wannabes cascading their views on the legal impact of such a claim: say "constructive dismissal" and you have everyone's attention.

This week, Ivan Israelstam starts the 2021 year with a question on disciplinary hearing procedures. What is hearsay evidence? What is the consequence of using hearsay evidence? Is hearsay evidence ever acceptable?  

This week, Ivan Israelstam sets out what the term "dereliction of duty" means. He explains why it is important for management to use the term correctly, neither to come on too strong against an employee, when other factors could explain events, nor to be too soft when the allegation of dereliction of duty would be correct.

This week Ivan Israelstam explains how the Labour Relations Act (LRA) affects labour brokers. The LRA refers to a Temporary Employment Service (TES) - that is a labour broker. Therefore, Ivan explains exactly how this can affect the labour broker adversely, when they try to dismiss one of their employees. 

This week Ivan Israelstam explains the history of a case, which went all the way through to the Constitutional Court. The case concerned employers' rights over dismissal decisions. Ivan explains the final outcome.

Ivan Israelstam illustrates with examples, why it is necessary for employers to ensure that incidents requiring disciplinary hearings, are fully investigated; and the evidence is collated and prepared ready for presentation. Failure to complete the investigation, the preparation, and the presentation steps is highly likely to lead to dismissed employees being reinstated by the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration. 

What is double jeopardy, how does it arise, and what are the consequences for employers? This week Ivan Israelstam uses cases to explain what double jeopardy is, and how employers get themselves into some very expensive consequences, when dismissing employees in these circumstances.

This week Ivan Israelstam explains why employers get into - expensive - difficulties at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration, or bargaining councils by incorrectly using fixed-term contracts. Why does this happen, and what should employers take into account to ensure that they can defend their actions if a dispute is lodged against them?

The Labour Court has defined 3 important characteristics of  incompatibility at the workplace. This week Ivan Israelstam expands upon each of the 3 characteristics, and explains what should be taken into account before dismissing an employee, and how incompatibility relates to incapacity.  

 Dismissing employees who have been arrested can be dangerous. That is the view of Ivan Israelstam, who this week explains why he makes that statement. He provides examples from the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Abitration (CCMA), bargaining council, Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court, so that employers can see exactly how they should interpret their obligations.

Pages

Advertisement

Subscribe to dismissal