This week Ivan Israelstam explains the process an exployer should adopt if a retrenchment of employees is contemplated. He explains what the steps are to be followed, to ensure that the employer complies with the requirements of the Labour Relations Act for what is an operational requirements dismissal.
This week, Ivan Israelstam explains the legally distinct reasons for dismissal: for misconduct, for poor work performance, and for operational requirements. These are distinctly different reasons, and each has a distinctly different procedure to achieve a legally compliant dismissal. There are always exceptions in the cases, but employers are well-advised to follow the standard methods for each circumstance.
The South African Constitution provides employees with the right to fair labour practices. Prior to a dismissal decision an employee should be made aware of the allegations against him/her and given chance to be heard on the matter.
When faced with challenges raised by employees, employers may be tempted to opt for a retrenchment exercise to remove employees who may seem to be too challenging of management authority. This week Ivan Israelstam explains what may genuinely be regarded as an operational requirement and why employers should be careful not to concoct reasons that will not stand up in court.
The world of work is changing rapidly. As a result of technological advances, globalisation, and competition employers need to make changes to their working conditions. This week Ivan Israelstam deals with how an employer should react when employees are reluctant to change their working arrangements, such as shift patterns. How should the employer respond?
To avoid performance management procedures of instruction, counselling, training, and coaching some employers have utilised the "retrenchment pool" concept. Into this "pool" they place individuals they want to be rid of - for whatever arbitrary reason. However, employers using such tactics are warned that this method has every chance of backfiring. This week Ivan Israelstam explains the consequences - and type of financial penalty - of trying to circumvent good management practice.