Talent retention - Are employees fixed assets or free agents

Advertisement

When it comes to talent retention in business some analysts think of employees as fixed assets - others look at them more as free agents. We look at the pros and cons of each approach.


Advertisement

 


In the context of talent retention, the analogy of employees being either "fixed assets" or "free agents" can be a useful way to frame different approaches to managing and valuing human capital within an organization. Here's an overview of each perspective:

Fixed Assets

  • Definition: Fixed assets refer to long-term, tangible assets that are not expected to be converted to cash within a year, such as buildings, machinery, and equipment. In this context, considering employees as fixed assets means viewing them as long-term investments.
  • Implications:
    • Long-Term Investment: The organization invests significantly in the development, training, and well-being of employees, aiming for long-term retention.
    • Stability: A stable workforce that understands the company’s values, culture, and processes, leading to continuity and accumulated institutional knowledge.
    • Loyalty and Commitment: Encourages a sense of loyalty and commitment from employees, who see themselves as integral to the company's success.
    • Costs: Significant investment in employee development and retention programs, including competitive salaries, benefits, and career development opportunities.

Free Agents

  • Definition: Free agents are typically individuals who are not bound by long-term contracts and have the flexibility to move between different employers or projects. Viewing employees as free agents implies a more flexible and dynamic workforce.
  • Implications:
    • Flexibility: The organization can adapt quickly to changing business needs by hiring talent with specific skills for short-term projects or roles.
    • Innovation: Bringing in new talent with diverse experiences can foster innovation and fresh perspectives.
    • Cost Management: Potentially lower long-term costs since the focus is on short-term engagements without extensive benefits and development investments.
    • Turnover and Continuity Risks: Higher turnover rates can lead to challenges in maintaining continuity and a consistent corporate culture.

Balanced Approach

In practice, many organizations adopt a balanced approach, recognizing that both perspectives have value depending on the strategic goals, industry, and specific roles within the company. For example:

  • Core Employees as Fixed Assets: Key roles that require deep company knowledge, leadership positions, and critical skill sets might be treated as fixed assets, with significant investment in retention and development.
  • Project-Based or Specialized Talent as Free Agents: For roles that are project-based or require specialized skills for a short duration, treating employees as free agents can provide the necessary flexibility and agility.

Conclusion

Ultimately, whether employees are considered fixed assets or free agents depends on the organization’s strategy, culture, and industry dynamics. A nuanced approach that leverages the strengths of both perspectives can enhance talent retention and organizational performance.

 

Suggested Article:

small business improving their talent management

Across the spectrum, business knows that investing in the training and development of employees has a high impact on overall organisational success. However, talent management can be costly to a business, especially smaller businesses. So how can talent management be improved affordably? 

Advertisement


Advertisement


Advertisement


Google News


Recommended Reading: Study At TUT

 



Advertisement i




Advertisement m