Advertisement

Contributors

This week Ivan Israelstam explains how the Labour Relations Act (LRA) affects labour brokers. The LRA refers to a Temporary Employment Service (TES) - that is a labour broker. Therefore, Ivan explains exactly how this can affect the labour broker adversely, when they try to dismiss one of their employees. 

This week Ivan Israelstam explains the history of a case, which went all the way through to the Constitutional Court. The case concerned employers' rights over dismissal decisions. Ivan explains the final outcome.

Employees do sometimes lay frivolous and vexatious claims against employers at the CCMA.  However, employees who do so may be ordered to pay the employer's legal costs. Even so, the employer should not give employees easy claims by failing to behave legally and responsively; and should definitely not underestimate the importance of preparing a response - even if the employees claims are spurious.

Ivan Israelstam illustrates with examples, why it is necessary for employers to ensure that incidents requiring disciplinary hearings, are fully investigated; and the evidence is collated and prepared ready for presentation. Failure to complete the investigation, the preparation, and the presentation steps is highly likely to lead to dismissed employees being reinstated by the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration. 

What is double jeopardy, how does it arise, and what are the consequences for employers? This week Ivan Israelstam uses cases to explain what double jeopardy is, and how employers get themselves into some very expensive consequences, when dismissing employees in these circumstances.

This week Ivan Israelstam explains why employers get into - expensive - difficulties at the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration, or bargaining councils by incorrectly using fixed-term contracts. Why does this happen, and what should employers take into account to ensure that they can defend their actions if a dispute is lodged against them?

The Labour Court has defined 3 important characteristics of  incompatibility at the workplace. This week Ivan Israelstam expands upon each of the 3 characteristics, and explains what should be taken into account before dismissing an employee, and how incompatibility relates to incapacity.  

This week Ivan Israelstam addresses questions about: the loyalty that an employer can legitimately expect from employees; what employees' rights are, for example to join a union; what a conflict of interest is, and how an employer should deal with conflict of interest.

 Dismissing employees who have been arrested can be dangerous. That is the view of Ivan Israelstam, who this week explains why he makes that statement. He provides examples from the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Abitration (CCMA), bargaining council, Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court, so that employers can see exactly how they should interpret their obligations.

What is the value that employees potentially add to a business, or organisation? What should employers do in order to maximise that value? What are the potential financial implications if employers do not follow the guidelines that Ivan Israelstam lays out? Ivan explains further. 

Pages

Advertisement

Subscribe to Contributors